Korean J Fertil Steril Search

CLOSE


Clin Exp Reprod Med > Epub ahead of print
Shim, Jang, Jung, Kim, Koo, Lee, Lee, and Kim: The impact of probiotics on testosterone synthesis in the TM3 cell line

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effects of specific probiotic strains on the endocrine activity of Leydig cells, which are essential for testosterone production. We focused on the potential influence of probiotics on testosterone synthesis and mitochondrial functionality within these cells.

Methods

The TM3 Leydig cell line was utilized to assess the effects of three probiotic strains: Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, Limosilactobacillus fermentum, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum. The analyses evaluated key aspects of Leydig cell function, including endocrine signaling pathways, cellular proliferation, gene and protein expression related to testosterone biosynthesis, and mitochondrial function.

Results

The probiotic strains significantly enhanced the expression of key proteins involved in testosterone synthesis and upregulated mitochondrial activity compared to control cells. Notably, these effects were observed across all three probiotic strains, suggesting a positive impact on both testosterone production and mitochondrial function.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that probiotic supplementation can modulate testosterone synthesis and improve mitochondrial functionality in Leydig cells. These results underscore the potential of probiotics as modulators of male reproductive health, with possible therapeutic applications in conditions such as male hypogonadism.

Introduction

Probiotic organisms have been identified in most human organs, including the male reproductive organs such as seminal plasma and testis [1,2]. Several scientific reports suggest that gut microbiota may play a significant role in male reproductive health. As a potential therapeutic approach, supplementation with targeted probiotics could serve as a complementary strategy to support overall reproductive well-being (R). Although the interaction between the gut microbiota—a diverse community of microorganisms residing in the gut—and Leydig cells has not been extensively studied, there is emerging evidence that the gut microbiota regulates both testosterone concentrations and the development of Leydig cells [3]. For example, certain bacterial species in the gut have been shown to affect the expression of genes encoding enzymes involved in testosterone synthesis. Nonetheless, further research is required to elucidate the relationship between the gut microbiota and Leydig cells.
Leydig cells are specialized cells located in the testis that secrete testosterone, which plays crucial roles in male sexual development and reproductive function [4]. The testosterone produced by Leydig cells induces extra-testicular androgenic and anabolic effects, serving as the key hormonal determinant of the male phenotype. Thus, Leydig cells are essential in supporting male reproductive functions. However, the connection between probiotics and the endocrine system in male reproductive physiology remains insufficiently explored. Although only a limited number of studies have addressed the effects of specific probiotics on Leydig cells, recent reports indicate that the gut microbiota does influence Leydig cell function, particularly with regard to testosterone production.
Several studies have indicated that probiotics exert therapeutic effects on male infertility [5]. Therefore, probiotics have the potential for clinical application to improve male fertility, including increasing sperm number and motility. The endocrine regulatory effects of probiotics on the male reproductive system have also been more clearly elucidated in recent research.
In the present study, we aimed to clarify the mechanisms underlying the effects of probiotics on the endocrine function of Leydig cells. To achieve this, we analyzed the effects of several probiotic bacterial strains on endocrine signaling pathways in TM3 cells in vitro.

Methods

Ethical approval was not applicable to this study as it did not involve human participants or animal experiments.

1. Preparation of TM3 cells

Mouse Leydig TM3 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (CRL-1714) and cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were seeded at a density of 4×10⁵ cells per dish and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO₂. Cells were passaged every 3–4 days at 70%–80% confluency, and the culture medium was refreshed 2 days after seeding.

2. Preparation of probiotic strains

The probiotic strains Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus BST0042, Limosilactobacillus fermentum BST0117, and Bifidobacterium longum (BL) subsp. longum BST0143 were generously donated by Biostream Technologies Co. Ltd. and cultured at 37 °C under anoxic conditions on BL agar (MB-B1380; MB Cell) for 48 hours. The strains were activated and subsequently cultured in food-grade media under controlled pH and anoxic conditions in a fermenter, using specific ingredients tailored for each strain to facilitate potential commercial production. Wet cell pellets were harvested by centrifugation, mixed with cryoprotectants, and frozen at −70 °C for 24 hours. The frozen samples were then dried for 72 hours, powdered, and packed in aluminum pouches for storage at −20 °C. The viability of each dried preparation was assessed by determining the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) per gram. For this, one gram of each sample was suspended in 9 mL of autoclaved phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 80 for 30 seconds and serially diluted (10⁸, 10⁹, and 10¹⁰-fold). Two hundred-microliter aliquots of each dilution were spread onto methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and BL agar plates and incubated at 37 °C under anoxic conditions for 48 hours, after which colonies were counted to calculate CFUs per gram of powder.

3. Cell proliferation assay

TM3 cells were treated with five different concentrations of each probiotic in 96-well plates. Cell proliferation was measured using the WST-8 Cell Viability Assay Kit (QM2500; Biomax). Absorbance at 450 nm was recorded after a 3-hour incubation period.

4. Measurement of the oxygen consumption rate

The oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was measured using a Seahorse XFp Analyzer (Agilent) following incubation of cells with each probiotic strain. The culture medium was replaced, and OCR measurements were taken after sequential addition of oligomycin, carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP), and rotenone/antimycin A. All data were normalized to protein content, and measurements were performed in quadruplicate. The basal respiration rate, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production, proton leakage, and coupling efficiency under each condition were calculated using the Multi-File_Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Test Report Generator. Mitochondrial data were visualized using stacked vertical bar graphs plotted with SigmaPlot ver. 12.5 (Grafiti LLC).

5. Gene expression analysis

RNA was extracted from TM3 cells, converted into cDNA, and amplified using specific primers for steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD)-3β, HSD-17β, cytochrome P450 family 11 subfamily A member 1 (CYP11A1), CYP17A1, and β-actin. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed with SYBR Green Supermix (#1725270; Bio-Rad). The PCR cycling conditions were 3 minutes at 95 °C, followed by 40 cycles of 10 seconds at 95 °C and 20 seconds at 60 °C. Gene expression was normalized to β-actin and analyzed in triplicate.

6. Western blot analysis

TM3 cells were trypsinized, lysed in Pro-Prep protein lysis buffer (17081; iNTron), and protein concentrations were quantified. Proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and detected using specific primary antibodies and chemiluminescence. Band intensities were normalized to β-actin. The primary antibodies used included mouse anti-StAR (PA5-21687; Invitrogen), mouse anti-HSD-3β (MA1-46438; Invitrogen), rabbit anti-sirtuin 1 (SIRT1, MA5-27217; Invitrogen), rabbit anti-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR, 2983S; Cell Signaling), rabbit anti-phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR, 5536S; Cell Signaling), mouse anti-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK, AHO1332; Thermo Fisher Scientific), rabbit anti-phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK, 701068; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and mouse anti-β-actin (MA5-15739; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Immunoreactive bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection reagent (Clarity Western Blot Substrate, 1705061; Bio-Rad), with images acquired using ImageSaver ver. 6 (ATTO). Band intensities were quantified using the CA4 analyzer v. 2.3.1 (ATTO). Activation ratios for p-mTOR and p-AMPK were calculated relative to their non-phosphorylated forms. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

7. Measurement of testosterone concentrations by ELISA

TM3 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 104 cells/well. The following day, the culture medium was replaced with medium containing L. rhamnosus BST0042, L. fermentum BST0117, or B. longum subsp. longum BST0143. Three days later, culture media were collected, and the concentrations of testosterone were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, EK7014; Boster).

8. Statistical analysis

All data are presented as the mean±standard error of the mean from triplicate measurements. Prior to statistical analysis, normality and homogeneity of variances were evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. Outliers were identified and excluded using the Grubbs' test. When required, data were log-transformed to satisfy parametric assumptions. Statistical significance was assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. All analyses were conducted using SigmaPlot ver. 12.5. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05, p<0.01, and p<0.001.

Results

1. Survival and proliferation of TM3 cells following probiotic treatment

We optimized the treatment conditions of TM3 cells with probiotic strains by comparing live probiotics, heat-inactivated strains, suspensions, and media alone. Live probiotics exhibited the most significant effects (Figure 1A) and were therefore used in subsequent experiments. The negative control groups included cells treated with heat-killed (death) probiotics, bacterial lysates (lysate), and probiotic filtrates (filtrate). These control treatments consistently showed baseline levels of cell viability and proliferation throughout the experiment, indicating that the enhanced cell growth observed was specifically due to the presence of live probiotic strains rather than non-viable bacteria or bacterial components. Treatment of 1×10⁶ TM3 cells with 10²–10⁵/mL dilutions of probiotics did not cause cytotoxicity. At these dilutions, probiotics increased cell proliferation after 3 days (Figure 1B), with L. rhamnosus BST0042 and L. fermentum BST0117 inducing two to three times more growth than controls. By day 6, the growth of control cells was similar to that of most treated groups, except for the group treated with L. rhamnosus BST0042, which maintained significantly higher growth. As shown in Figure 1C, all probiotic-treated groups exhibited significantly higher cell growth than the control group at both day 3 and day 6. Notably, the control group showed particularly low growth at day 3, which may have contributed to the pronounced differences observed at this time point.

2. Mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate of TM3 cells

We analyzed mitochondrial respiration in TM3 cells treated with different probiotic preparations using an extracellular flux analyzer to assess metabolic profiles. The OCR was measured in real-time following sequential injection of oligomycin, FCCP, and rotenone/antimycin A. (Figure 2: A, death; B, lysate; C, filtrate; D, L. rhamnosus BST0042; E, L. fermentum BST0117; F, B. longum subsp. longum BST0143). The basal respiration rate and spare respiratory capacity were significantly higher in cells treated with L. rhamnosus BST0042 and B. longum subsp. ongum BST0143 than in control and L. fermentum BST0117-treated cells (Figure 3A, 3B). Proton leakage was elevated in all probiotic-treated groups, and the highest level of proton leakage was observed in cells treated with L. rhamnosus BST0042 and B. longum subsp. longum BST0143 (Figure 3C). ATP production increased in all probiotic-treated groups and was highest in cells treated with L. rhamnosus BST0042 (Figure 3D). The coupling efficiency was similar in all control groups, including negative controls. However, these findings suggest that probiotics, particularly L. rhamnosus BST0042, improve mitochondrial metabolism in TM3 cells by increasing oxygen consumption and promoting mitochondrial recovery.

3. Probiotics upregulate steroidogenesis in TM3 cells

Next, we compared the expression of steroidogenesis-related genes (StAR, HSD-3β, HSD-17β, CYP11A1, and CYP17A1) in probiotic-treated TM3 cells. qPCR analysis showed that the expression of these genes was significantly higher in probiotic-treated cells than in control cells (Figure 4). Among the probiotic-treated groups, expression of these genes was highest in L. rhamnosus BST0042-treated cells and lowest in B. longum subsp. longum BST0143-treated cells.

4. Effects of probiotics on expression of proteins that regulate key cellular functions

We next measured the expression of proteins involved in steroidogenesis. The levels of StAR and HSD-3β were higher in all probiotic-treated groups compared with the control group (Figure 5A). Additionally, we assessed the expression of proteins involved in mitochondrial function, including mTOR, p-mTOR, AMPK, p-AMPK, and SIRT1. Probiotic treatment increased phosphorylation of mTOR and AMPK in TM3 cells. The p-mTOR/mTOR ratio was up to 30% higher in probiotic-treated groups than in controls (Figure 5B). The p-AMPK/AMPK ratio was significantly elevated in cells treated with L. rhamnosus BST0042 and B. longum subsp. longum BST0143, and SIRT1 expression was substantially upregulated by all probiotics.

5. Effects of probiotics on testosterone secretion by TM3 cells

Finally, we measured testosterone concentrations in the culture media of probiotic-treated and control TM3 cells using ELISA. The testosterone concentration was significantly higher in the culture media of all probiotic-treated cells compared to controls (Figure 6). The highest testosterone level was detected in the culture medium of L. rhamnosus BST0042-treated cells (approximately 0.4 ng/mL), and the concentrations in the media of L. fermentum BST0117- and B. longum subsp. longum BST0143-treated cells were up to 1.7 times higher than those of the control group.

Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated that probiotics improve the endocrine function of TM3 cells, a cell line derived from mouse Leydig cells. Commensal organisms originating from the human gut increased cell proliferation, expression of genes and proteins involved in steroidogenesis and mitochondrial regulation, as well as mitochondrial function in TM3 cells. L. rhamnosus BST0042, L. fermentum BST0117, and B. longum subsp. longum BST0143 enhanced the proliferation of TM3 cells, increased the OCR, and upregulated expression of StAR and HSD-3β, both of which are key mediators of steroidogenesis. These findings suggest that specific probiotics positively affect indices related to male reproduction and may be useful in the treatment of male hypogonadism.
Leydig cells serve as the principal endocrine support cells in testicular tissue. Maintaining a sufficient population of Leydig cells is critical for homeostasis and the maintenance of spermatogenesis in the testis. Our findings show that probiotics such as L. rhamnosus BST0042 and B. longum subsp. longum BST0143 promote the proliferation of Leydig cells. This is consistent with previous reports that endogenous microbiota regulate intestinal stem cell activities and cell fate decisions [6]. Furthermore, probiotics have been previously reported to affect cell proliferation and death. In a previous in vivo study, probiotic-treated mice exhibited a higher number of intestinal stem cells than mice with normal microbiota [7-9].
Steroidogenesis in Leydig cells produces testosterone, which is essential for male reproductive function. The regulation of testicular steroidogenesis occurs at several levels. Initially, StAR proteins mediate cholesterol transport from outside mitochondria to the inner mitochondrial membrane. Cholesterol is then converted to pregnenolone by CYP11A1, after which pregnenolone is metabolized by enzymes in the smooth endoplasmic reticulum, including 3β-HSD, CYP17A1, and 17β-HSD [10]. Our study revealed that probiotics significantly upregulate genes encoding these steroidogenic enzymes. Probiotics markedly increased StAR expression, and both L. rhamnosus BST0042 and B. longum subsp. longum BST0143 increased HSD-3β protein expression in TM3 cells.
Gut probiotics also affect serum cholesterol concentration through metabolism of cholesterol to coprostanol. Previous studies have engineered probiotics to express the intestinal steroid metabolism A (IsmA) gene, as part of multidisciplinary approaches involving de novo gene assembly, metabolomics, and biochemical knowledge. These IsmA+ gut bacteria have been shown to reduce fecal and serum cholesterol concentrations in humans [10]. In addition, other probiotic strains, such as B. longum and Bifidobacterium bifidum, upregulate oxidative phosphorylation in white adipose tissue by increasing bile acid signaling, thereby protecting against diet-induced metabolic conditions such as obesity and hepatic steatosis [11]. However, the components or products of probiotic strains that affect steroidogenesis in Leydig cells remain to be identified. No direct link has yet been established between StAR and the effects of probiotics. Our results indicate that these probiotics increase steroidogenesis, which in turn may improve spermatogenesis in the testis, as the steroid hormone testosterone is essential for the production of mature sperm from germ cells during spermatogenesis.
Lipid metabolism and steroidogenesis are closely integrated in mitochondria and are both required for testosterone production in Leydig cells [12]. Mitochondria are also responsible for generating energy through the catabolism of carbohydrates, amino acids, lipids, and nucleotides [11]. Probiotics generate energy and are therefore indirectly linked to host metabolism. The observation that probiotic treatment increases mitochondrial respiration highlights the importance of mitochondrial function and homeostasis in Leydig cells. In this study, we demonstrated that probiotics significantly increased the basal mitochondrial respiration rate of Leydig cells. Excessively high OCR is generally associated with proton leakage, which results in the production of reactive oxygen species [13]. Therefore, our findings that probiotics increased OCR, proton leakage, and energy production suggest that these bacteria help preserve mitochondrial function (Figure 2). Probiotic-induced enhancements of energy generation and metabolism may support spermatogenesis, given that this process requires a substantial supply of mitochondria-derived energy. We propose that probiotics improve male fertility by increasing mitochondrial energy metabolism.
To better understand the effects of probiotics on mitochondrial function in Leydig cells, we examined the expression and activation of several mitochondrial proteins that are crucial for adaptation to metabolic stress and energy balance in mammals, including mTOR, AMPK, and SIRT1. Mitochondria play several essential roles, such as in the synthesis of amino acids, lipids, and nucleotides, and in promoting cell growth via nutrient metabolism [14]. Proteins such as AMPK (a serine/threonine kinase), mTOR, and the SIRT family are major regulators of mitochondrial metabolism [15]. These proteins are associated with multiple metabolic signaling pathways that underpin mitochondrial function [14]. AMPK is activated in response to low ATP levels and increases cellular energy metabolism [16]. mTOR regulates synthesis of proteins involved in cellular homeostasis, growth, and survival [17] and also controls the assembly of microtubular proteins and cell proliferation. SIRT proteins, as nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide+-dependent histone deacetylases, modulate the acetylation of specific proteins and thereby play pivotal roles in cell physiology and pathology [18]. AMPK serves as a key energy sensor in most cell types and regulates various physiological responses, including autophagy, lipid metabolism, and protein synthesis [19]. Our data show that the p-AMPK/AMPK ratio is elevated in probiotic-treated TM3 cells. Another study reported that AMPK activation improves stem cell function through interactions with SIRT1/forkhead box O and inhibition of mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) [20]. mTOR regulates several processes in eukaryotic cells, including growth and metabolism in response to environmental stimuli, such as nutrients and growth factors [19]. mTOR is a kinase that regulates a major eukaryotic signaling network and plays a fundamental role in cellular and organismal physiology; however, some aspects of its function remain unclear. It exists as two subtypes, mTOR1 and mTOR2, which have different roles and downstream signaling pathways. Inhibition of mTORC1 has been shown to induce autophagy, preserve the stem cell pool, and improve tissue function, thus holding potential clinical relevance [21]. AMPK and mTORC1 often exert antagonistic effects, for example, on autophagy and apoptosis [22]. SIRT1, the best-studied member of the SIRT family, has a broad range of molecular targets [23] and has been implicated as an important mediator of host-probiotic interactions. It plays roles in numerous cellular processes, including gene transcription, mitochondrial biogenesis, insulin secretion, and glucose and lipid metabolism. Collectively, these findings suggest that probiotics activate AMPK, mTOR, and SIRT1, which likely underpins their positive effects on lipid metabolism and mitochondrial energy production (Figure 6). Thus, probiotics exert beneficial effects on both the energy status and endocrine activity of TM3 cells through AMPK, mTOR, and SIRT1 signaling.
The primary function of Leydig cells is to secrete testosterone, supporting spermatogenesis and male reproductive capacity. Our results indicate that probiotic treatment enhances both steroidogenesis and mitochondrial function in Leydig cells, thereby promoting testosterone production and overall male reproductive health. Nonetheless, several limitations remain. The effects of probiotic administration on testosterone production have not previously been investigated in detail. The role of probiotics and other signaling molecules in male hypogonadism requires further study. Despite these limitations, our findings highlight the potential impact of probiotics on testosterone synthesis and offer new insights into the management of male hypogonadism.
The probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus fermentum, and B. longum subsp. longum have been observed to influence both steroidogenesis and mitochondrial activity in Leydig cells. Specifically, these strains increase the OCR by modulating longevity-related factors such as mTOR and SIRT1, as well as proteins involved in steroidogenesis, including StAR and HSD-3β. Taken together, these findings suggest a potential role for these probiotics in supporting male reproductive health; however, further research is warranted to determine their therapeutic applications in conditions such as male hypogonadism.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: YHS, IJ, JHL. Methodology: JYJ, YJK. Formal analysis: JYJ. Data curation: JHL, DKK. Funding acquisition: IJ, JHL, DKK. Validation: YHS, JYJ, YJK, YDK. Investigation: THL, JHL. Supervision: J.H.L. Writing-original draft: JHL, DKK. Writing-review & editing: IJ, DKK. Approval of final manuscript: YHS, JYJ, YJK, YDK, IJ, THL, JHL, DKK.

Figure 1.
Proliferation of probiotic-treated TM3 cells. (A) Proliferation of TM3 cells treated with live probiotics, dead probiotics, lysates of probiotics, and filtered culture media of probiotics for 3 or 6 days. (B) Proliferation of TM3 cells treated with different concentrations of probiotics for 3 or 6 days. (C) Proliferation of TM3 cells treated with different probiotics for 3 or 6 days. Data are presented as mean±standard error of the mean of three replicates (n=3 per group). Statistical significance was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). O.D., optical density. a)p<0.05; b)p<0.01; c)p<0.001 vs. control.
cerm-2025-08095f1.jpg
Figure 2.
Oxygen consumption rates (OCRs) of probiotic-treated TM3 cells. Real-time oxygen consumption rates of TM3 cells treated with control, negative controls (death, lysate, filtrate), and selected probiotic strains were measured using an extracellular flux analyzer. Line graphs showing the OCRs of TM3 cells exposed to (A) death, (B) lysate, (C) filtrate, (D) Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus BST0042, (E) Limosilactobacillus fermentum BST0117, and (F) Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum BST0143. Data are presented as mean±standard error of the mean (n=6 per group) of triplicate values. Statistical significance was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). FCCP, carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone; R/A, reference/antibody or reference/assay.
cerm-2025-08095f2.jpg
Figure 3.
Quantitative analysis of mitochondrial respiratory function in probiotic-treated TM3 cells. To determine the effects of probiotic treatment on mitochondrial function in TM3 Leydig cells, key bioenergetic parameters were quantitatively analyzed based on oxygen consumption rate data obtained from extracellular flux analysis. (A) Basal respiration, (B) spare respiratory capacity, (C) proton leakage, (D) adenosine triphosphate (ATP) production. The coupling efficiency was determined automatically by the manufacturer’s software. Data are presented as mean±standard error of the mean (n=6 per group) of triplicate values. Statistical significance was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). a)p<0.01; b)p<0.001 vs. control.
cerm-2025-08095f3.jpg
Figure 4.
Expression of genes involved in steroidogenesis in probiotic-treated TM3 cells. mRNA expression of the steroidogenesis-associated genes (A) steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), (B) hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD)-3β, (C) HSD-17β, (D) cytochrome P450 family 11 subfamily A member 1 (CYP11A1), and (E) CYP17A1 measured by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Data are presented as mean±standard error of the mean (n=6 per group) of triplicate values. Statistical significance was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). a)p<0.05; b)p<0.01; c)p<0.001 vs. control.
cerm-2025-08095f4.jpg
Figure 5.
Expression of proteins involved in steroidogenesis in probiotic-treated TM3 cells. (A) Expression of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD)-3β, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR), AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK), sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), and the reference protein β-actin in control and probiotic-treated cells assessed by Western blotting. (B) Ratios of p-mTOR/mTOR and p-AMPK/AMPK determined from band intensities and normalized to the control values. Data are presented as mean±standard error of the mean (n=3 per group) of triplicate values. Statistical significance was determined by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). a)p<0.05; b)p<0.01; c)p<0.001 vs. control.
cerm-2025-08095f5.jpg
Figure 6.
Testosterone production by probiotic-treated TM3 cells. Testosterone concentrations in culture media of probiotic-treated TM3 cells measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The assays were performed in triplicate. Data are presented as mean±standard error of the mean (n=3 per group) of triplicate values. Statistical significance was determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). a)p<0.01; b)p<0.001 vs. control.
cerm-2025-08095f6.jpg
Figure 7.
Signaling and metabolic pathways affected by probiotics in TM3 cells. Probiotic treatment enhances testosterone biosynthesis in TM3 cells by influencing both signaling cascades and steroidogenic enzyme expression. Upon probiotic stimulation, the sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathways are activated, as evidenced by increased levels of SIRT1, phosphorylated AMPK (p-AMPK), and phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR). These signaling events promote the upregulation of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), which facilitates cholesterol transport into mitochondria. In the mitochondria, cholesterol is converted into pregnenolone by cytochrome P450 family 11 subfamily A member 1 (CYP11A1) and further into progesterone by hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (HSD)-3β. The steroidogenic pathway continues in the endoplasmic reticulum, where pregnenolone and progesterone are sequentially converted to androstenedione and ultimately to testosterone through the enzymatic actions of CYP17A1 and HSD-17β. Overall, probiotic-induced activation of SIRT1 and AMPK/mTOR pathways improves mitochondrial function and upregulates steroidogenic enzyme expression, thereby increasing testosterone production in Leydig cells.
cerm-2025-08095f7.jpg

References

1. Altmae S, Franasiak JM, Mandar R. The seminal microbiome in health and disease. Nat Rev Urol 2019;16:703-21.
crossref pmid pdf
2. Farahani L, Tharakan T, Yap T, Ramsay JW, Jayasena CN, Minhas S. The semen microbiome and its impact on sperm function and male fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology 2021;9:115-44.
crossref pmid pdf
3. Feng T, Liu Y. Microorganisms in the reproductive system and probiotic’s regulatory effects on reproductive health. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2022;20:1541-53.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Zirkin BR, Papadopoulos V. Leydig cells: formation, function, and regulation. Biol Reprod 2018;99:101-11.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Oliveira LC, Costa EC, Martins FD, Rocha AS, Brasil GA. Probiotics supplementation in the treatment of male infertility: a systematic review. JBRA Assist Reprod 2024;28:341-8.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Zhang H, Menzies KJ, Auwerx J. The role of mitochondria in stem cell fate and aging. Development 2018;145:dev143420.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
7. Ahmad Sophien AN, Jusop AS, Tye GJ, Tan YF, Wan Kamarul Zaman WS, Nordin F. Intestinal stem cells and gut microbiota therapeutics: hype or hope? Front Med (Lausanne) 2023;10:1195374.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Gao J, Wang L, Jiang J, Xu Q, Zeng N, Lu B, et al. A probiotic bi-functional peptidoglycan hydrolase sheds NOD2 ligands to regulate gut homeostasis in female mice. Nat Commun 2023;14:3338.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
9. Hou Y, Wei W, Guan X, Liu Y, Bian G, He D, et al. A diet-microbial metabolism feedforward loop modulates intestinal stem cell renewal in the stressed gut. Nat Commun 2021;12:271.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
10. Kenny DJ, Plichta DR, Shungin D, Koppel N, Hall AB, Fu B, et al. Cholesterol metabolism by uncultured human gut bacteria influences host cholesterol level. Cell Host Microbe 2020;28:245-57.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Kim G, Yoon Y, Park JH, Park JW, Noh MG, Kim H, et al. Bifidobacterial carbohydrate/nucleoside metabolism enhances oxidative phosphorylation in white adipose tissue to protect against diet-induced obesity. Microbiome 2022;10:188.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
12. Marinkovic DZ, Medar ML, Becin AP, Andric SA, Kostic TS. Growing up under constant light: a challenge to the endocrine function of the leydig cells. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:653602.
crossref pmid pmc
13. Dranka BP, Benavides GA, Diers AR, Giordano S, Zelickson BR, Reily C, et al. Assessing bioenergetic function in response to oxidative stress by metabolic profiling. Free Radic Biol Med 2011;51:1621-35.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Spinelli JB, Haigis MC. The multifaceted contributions of mitochondria to cellular metabolism. Nat Cell Biol 2018;20:745-54.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
15. Sadria M, Layton AT. Interactions among mTORC, AMPK and SIRT: a computational model for cell energy balance and metabolism. Cell Commun Signal 2021;19:57.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
16. Garcia D, Shaw RJ. AMPK: mechanisms of cellular energy sensing and restoration of metabolic balance. Mol Cell 2017;66:789-800.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Wei X, Luo L, Chen J. Roles of mTOR signaling in tissue regeneration. Cells 2019;8:1075.
crossref pmid pmc
18. Singh CK, Chhabra G, Ndiaye MA, Garcia-Peterson LM, Mack NJ, Ahmad N. The role of sirtuins in antioxidant and redox signaling. Antioxid Redox Signal 2018;28:643-61.
crossref pmid pmc
19. Herzig S, Shaw RJ. AMPK: guardian of metabolism and mitochondrial homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018;19:121-35.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
20. Maiese K. Targeting the core of neurodegeneration: FoxO, mTOR, and SIRT1. Neural Regen Res 2021;16:448-55.
crossref pmid pmc
21. Bassi G, Sidhu SK, Mishra S. The expanding role of mitochondria, autophagy and lipophagy in steroidogenesis. Cells 2021;10:1851.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Mounier R, Lantier L, Leclerc J, Sotiropoulos A, Foretz M, Viollet B. Antagonistic control of muscle cell size by AMPK and mTORC1. Cell Cycle 2011;10:2640-6.
crossref pmid
23. Wu QJ, Zhang TN, Chen HH, Yu XF, Lv JL, Liu YY, et al. The sirtuin family in health and disease. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022;7:402.
crossref pmid pmc
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •   Scopus
  • 433 View
  • 12 Download
Related articles in Clin Exp Reprod Med


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
82 Gumi-ro 173, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13620, Korea
Tel: +82-31-787-7254    CP: +82-10-9072-3154    E-mail: blasto@snubh.org                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next